This report is focused around Lost and Found data using the intakes and outcomes data received for 2019-2021 (up to September). Its goal is to reflect everything we could learn about L&F from the available data, make sure the numbers we see make sense, and highlight things that would be useful to show but some/all data required for them are missing.
Date range: 2019-01-01 to 2021-12-31
Scroll down or use the table of contents on the left to navigate throughout the document. Most sections contain multiple tabs showing different facets of a data type. Most plots are interactive, meaning they include tooltips and allow hiding and showing parts and zooming in and out. If something went wrong, look for the house icon in the top right corner of each figure to reset.
This table covers all strays and RTHs. RTH rates shown below are the number of strays with RTH outcomes out of all strays.
When we go over this, let’s make sure we calculate the rate the same way you do, so we would want to make sure what we see makes sense. If these numbers are right, the 2021 figure is right around the HASS average for dogs which is at 30% RTH rate and higher than the 2% average for cats.
| Species | Year | Strays | RTH_Count | RTH_Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cat | 2019 | 1702 | 42 | 2.47% |
| Cat | 2020 | 1319 | 44 | 3.34% |
| Cat | 2021 | 1654 | 82 | 4.96% |
| Dog | 2019 | 2883 | 704 | 24.42% |
| Dog | 2020 | 2211 | 544 | 24.6% |
| Dog | 2021 | 3610 | 1067 | 29.56% |
These three time series show the RTH rate per month, to show whether there were times with particularly high or low rates as well as the overall trajectory.
This figure shows RTH rates for all intakes combined. There has been a steady increase from early 2020 (but more noticeably August 2020) to about March 2021, where the RTH rate stabilizes around 30%. Cat RTH rate are lower in the summer, as one could expect.
This trend is quite different from the overall one – there are lots of ups and downs but without a consistent improvement over time since 2019.
This trend, however, is responsible for the improvement of overall return rates shown in the Overall tab, as most intakes are Public Drop Offs. The improvement starts around August 2020 and continues.
This section shows the number of stray intakes over time, as well as the breakdown of strays by field/shelter intake, primarily to give us some context for the rest of the data seeing how many animals are coming in. It is probably not anything you don’t already know.
The average difference in length of stay (in days) between strays with RTH outcomes and all other strays is shown in the table below – roughly 17 days for dogs and 32 for cats. That means that every successful RTH saves 17 days of care on average (for dogs) at KCPP.
We can make a cost savings calculation using these LOS numbers, the number of RTHs, and a daily cost of care if that is of interest. To offer a simple example, assuming a daily cost of care of $30, returning an extra 200 dogs in 2021 would have resulted in a $102,000 cost saving.
| Species | Outcome | Count | Average_Length_Of_Stay |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cat | Other Outcomes | 4477 | 37.94 |
| Cat | RTO | 168 | 5.65 |
| Dog | Other Outcomes | 5700 | 18.62 |
| Dog | RTO | 2315 | 1.92 |
The following maps show stray intake and RTH rate by ZIP codes to highlight geographical patterns. The first and second tab are similar to previous metrics; the third tab, RTH Gap, shows the number of strays who were not returned home per ZIP code.
*Note: we can also use found locations / crossing to map stray intakes by Census tracts, which produces a more granular map. In this map, we have only used found locations to remove those who had 7077 Elmwood or 4400 Raytown from the map.
Note #2: 10494 of the 13619 stray animals did not have a ZIP code listed. This means this map is incomplete. As we mention below, if this kind of mapping would be helpful, we can try to create a version using found locations if that is more reliably documented.
This is a fairly common pattern – the areas with higher stray intake tend to have lower RTH rates (it’s easier to return a higher percentage of 10-20 dogs, of course). However, some areas with 30/40 strays stand out with 50%+ return rate.
This combines the other two tabs to highlight where most additional RTH potential exists. As the RTH rate is fairly lower in high intake areas, they stand out again in this map.
This is similar to the maps above, but for cats. Similar areas stand out to the dogs map.
Since RTH rate is pretty low across the city, it is also low throughout in this map.
This is very similar to the stray map because of the low RTH occurrence for cats.
Showing 524 stray cats of which 39 were RTH.
Zip codes - as we mentioned, 10494 of the 13619 stray animals did not have a ZIP code listed. Some had a blank value, but most (10490 animals) entered as ‘Kansas City’. This meant using ZIP codes was probably not very representative.
Outcome Subtype for RTH - if a return to owner in the field can take place, it is worth creating a dedicated outcome subtype for it.
Other things we could show (some requiring more data):
Thanks for reading through, and we’re looking forward to talking through it and thinking about more ways to make this data useful for you.